AIR2013SC1479, 2013 (98) ALR 722, 2013(2)ARBLR105(SC), 2013 3 AWC2984SC, 2013(2)B.L.J.513, [2013]114CLA18(SC), [2013]177CompCas475(SC), (2013)2CompLJ271(SC), 2013(2)CTC888, JT2013(8)SC159, 2013-3-LW311, 2013(4)MhLj96, (2013)3MLJ480, 2013(3)MPLJ51, (2013)171PLR675, 2013(2)RCR(Civil)953, 2013(5)SCALE96, (2013)4SCC35, (2013)2WBLR(SC)778, 2013(3)WLN37

In the course of arguments before us, on behalf of the appellant certain names of retired High Court Judges were indicated to the senior counsel for the Corporation for appointment as sole arbitrator but the Corporation did not agree to any of the names proposed by the appellant. In the circumstances, we are left with no choice but to send the matter back to the Chief Justice of the Allahabad High Court for an appropriate order on the application made by the dealer under Section 11(6). Civil Appeal is, accordingly, allowed. The impugned order is set aside. Arbitration Case No. 107 of 2004, M/s. Deep Trading Company 12Page 13 v. M/s. Indian Oil Corporation and others, is restored to the file of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad for fresh consideration by the Chief Justice or the designate Judge, as the case may be, in accordance with law and in light of the observations made above. No costs.

Arbitration and Concilation Act, 1996