JSW Energy Limited V/s Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd.

Information Type: Judicial Information
Court: Tribunals
Tribunals Name: Appellate Tribunal for Electricity
Date of Judgment(s): 2013-12-02
Case No: 20 of 2012
Case Type: Appeal
Judge Name: M Karpaga Vinayagam, (Chairperson) & V.J Talwar (Technical Member)
Subject: Electricity Law
Statutes / Acts: Electricity Act, 2003
Bench Strength: Double Bench
Advocate: M G Ramachandran, Anand K Ganesan, Swagatika Sahoo (P) & Subhan Srivastava, Deepa Chavan, Aditya Dewan et. al (R)
State of Appellant(s): Maharashtra
History of Case No: Maharashtra State Commission State Commission did not allow the said claim and dismissed the Petition on 16.11.2011
Case Note / Description :

The aspect of the knowledge of the pending proceedings before the Courts in Indonesia of the Appellant is a very important point to be considered to decide this issue. Perusal of the above facts of the case would establish that the there was an on-going litigation involving the mining rights of the coal supplier at the time of signing of coal supply agreement. The learned Counsel for the Distribution License contended that these facts ought to have been known to the Appellant. On the other hand, the Appellant has submitted that the Distribution Licensee (Respondent) did not raise these issues before the State Commission and without dealing with those issues the State Commission has merely dealt with the issue from the action of Foreign Government instrumentality and held that Clause 12.3 of the PPA permits only the action by the Indian Government instrumentality can be the ground for force Majeure. These factual aspects admittedly, have not been placed before the State Commission. Thus, the State Commission did not deal with the various factual aspects raised by the Distribution Licensee before this Tribunal for the first time especially with reference to knowledge of the Appellant about the pendency of the litigation and the amendment to the Coal Supply Agreement. view of our above summary of our findings, we feel that this matter be remanded to the State Commission for examining the issue raised by the Distribution Licensee regarding the knowledge of the Appellant on the on-going litigation and amendment to the Coal Supply Agreement and the facts thereon. Accordingly, we remand the matter back to the State Commission with the direction that these issues must be considered afresh in the light of the materials to be furnished by both the parties and decide the same in accordance with the law. 38. The State Commission is directed to go into the issue in the light of the observations made above. Both the parties must cooperate with the State Commission for the expeditious disposal of the matter by furnishing all the details to the State Commission.

Electricity Act, 2003

 

 
 
SignUp For News Letter

Get news and updates from OLIS group, to your email :
Contact Information
Raj Kumar (Ph.D Research Scholar)
Dr. M. Madhusudhan (Supervisor)
DEPARTMENT OF LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE
II Floor, Tutorial Building, University of Delhi , Delhi-110 007
Mobile : +91-011-27666656
Email : info@olisindia.in
All Rights Reserved@ University of Delhi, Website Designed and Developed by Raj Kumar(Ph.D Research Scholar)