B.A. Umesh V/s Regr. Gen. High Court of Karnataka

Information Type: Judicial Information
Court: Supreme Court
Date of Judgment(s): 2011-02-01
Case No: 285-286 of 2011 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) Nos. 3131-3132 of 2009)
Case Type: Appeal (Criminal)
Judge Name: Altmas Kabir & A.K.Patnaik
Subject: Criminal law -Rape and Murder
Statutes / Acts: Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section: s. 302 7 376
Bench Strength: Double Bench
Advocate: Kiran Suri, S.J. Amith, Ankolekar Gurudatta et. al (P) & Anitha Sheniy, Rashmi Nandakumar and B.S. Gautham (R)
State of Appellant(s): Karnataka
History of Case No: udgment and Order dated 04.10.2007 of the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in Criminal Referred Case No. 3 of 2006 C/w. Criminal Appeal No. 2408 of 2006 and Criminal Reference Case No. 3 of 2006 C/w Criminal Appeal No. 2408 of 2006
Equal Citation Details :

(2011)1SCC(Cri)801, [2011]2SCR367, 2011(2)ACR1478(SC), AIR2011SC1000, 2011(59)BLJR267, 2011(2)JCC924, [2011(2)JCR265(SC)], JT2011(2)SC128, 2011(1)RCR(Criminal)803, 2011(1)RCR(Criminal)804, 2011(2)SCALE111, (2011)3SCC85

Case Note / Description :

On the question of sentence we are satisfied that the extreme depravity with which the offences were committed and the merciless manner in which death was inflicted on the victim, brings it within the category of rarest of rare cases which merits the death penalty, as awarded by the Trial Court and confirmed by the High Court. None of the mitigating factors as were indicated by this Court in Bachan Singh’s case (supra) or in Machhi Singh’s case (supra) are present in the facts of the instant case. The appellant even made up a story as to his presence in the house on seeing P.W.2 Suresh, who had come there in the meantime. Apart from the above, it is clear from the recoveries made from his house that this was not the first time that he had committed crimes in other premises 66also, before he was finally caught by the public two days after the present incident, while trying to escape from the house of one Seeba where he made a similar attempt to rob and assault her and in the process causing injuries to her. As has been indicated by the Courts below, the antecedents of the appellant and his subsequent conduct indicates that he is a menace to society and is incapable of rehabilitation. The offences committed by the appellant were neither under duress nor on provocation and an innocent life was snuffed out by him after committing violent rape on the victim. He did not feel any remorse in regard to his actions, inasmuch as, within two days of the incident he was caught by the local public while committing an offence of a similar type in the house of one Seeba.

Indian Penal Code, 1860

 
 
SignUp For News Letter

Get news and updates from OLIS group, to your email :
Contact Information
Raj Kumar (Ph.D Research Scholar)
Dr. M. Madhusudhan (Supervisor)
DEPARTMENT OF LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE
II Floor, Tutorial Building, University of Delhi , Delhi-110 007
Mobile : +91-011-27666656
Email : info@olisindia.in
All Rights Reserved@ University of Delhi, Website Designed and Developed by Raj Kumar(Ph.D Research Scholar)